Ex Parte BROWN et al - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2002-0880                                                                                     
              Application No. 09/183,214                                                                               


              test parameters.  Each of the sets of test parameters is associated with one or more of                  
              the products to be tested by the automated test system 10.   See page 8 of Appellants’                   
              specification.                                                                                           
                     The processor 16 is operable to receive input from the input device 30, including                 
              input identifying a product model identifier.  The processor 16 is further operable to                   
              retrieve from the storage device 12 the set of test parameters associated with the                       
              product model identifier.  The product is further operable to retrieve from the storage                  
              device 12 the set of test parameters associated with the product model identifier.  The                  
              processor is still further operable to generate a control signal that includes the retrieved             
              set of test parameters.  See page 11 of Appellants’ specification.  The test apparatus                   
              18 is a device operable to perform product testing by applying an input to a DUT and                     
              measuring a quantity from the DUT.  The test apparatus 18 is operably connected to                       
              receive the test parameters from, and to provide test result data to the processor 16.                   
              To this end, the test apparatus 18 in the embodiment described herein is coupled to the                  
              processor 16 through the I/O circuitry 28 and communicates with the processor 16 over                    
              a I.E.E.E. 488 link 17.                                                                                  
                     Independent claims 1 and 8 are representative of Appellants’ claimed invention,                   
              and are reproduced as follows:                                                                           





                                                          3                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007