The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte JOHN P. MOYNA _______________ Appeal No. 2002-0894 Application No. 09/283,650 _______________ HEARD: Jan. 21, 2003 _______________ Before STAAB, MCQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 21-26, 28-31 and 33-40, all the claims pending in the application. Appellant’s invention pertains to an ejector device for ejecting load material (claims 21, 22, 28-31 and 33-36), a method 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007