Appeal No. 2002-0894 Application No. 09/283,650 of ejecting load material (claims 23, 24 and 40), and a ground- driven mobile work machine having an device for ejecting load material (claims 25, 26 and 37-39). An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 21, reproduced below (with emphasis added): 21. A load-carrying body for use with a mobile work machine, comprising: first and second opposed side walls; a floor joining said side walls; a movable ejector interposed between said side walls and having a lower margin adjacent said floor and an upper margin, said side walls, said floor, and said ejector together defining a load cavity open at an end thereof; an ejector actuator connected with said ejector for moving said ejector toward said open end to eject load material from said cavity through said open end, movement of said ejector against said load material causing said ejector to tilt at its upper margin toward said open end to press the lower margin of said ejector against the floor of said body. The single reference relied upon by the examiner in the final rejection is: Neyland 2,996,202 Aug. 15, 1961 Claims 21-26, 28-31 and 33-40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, “as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007