The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KATHARINA SEITZ,
STEPHAN SÜßBRICH,
MICHAEL HORNUNG,
HEINRICH KÜHN,
and
FRANK HILTMANN
_____________
Appeal No. 2002-0895
Application No. 09/402,552
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 20 and 21. Claims
1 through 10 and 12 through 16, the remaining claims in the
above-identified application, have been indicated to be
allowable.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007