Ex Parte CHIN et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-1043                                                        
          Application 08/784,860                                                      


          Appellants’ specification.                                                  
               Independent claim 1 is representative of Appellants’ claimed           
          invention and is reproduced as follows:                                     
               1.  A wireless communication network supporting a plurality            
          of mobile terminals each capable of receiving messages selectably           
          at a first data rate and a second data rate, and transmitting               
          messages at a third data rate, said first data rate being greater           
          than both said second and third data rates, said network                    
          comprising:                                                                 
               a network control center; and                                          
               a plurality of base stations coupled to said network control           
          center, each base station being capable of receiving messages               
          from said mobile terminals at said third data rate and relaying             
          said messages to said network control center wherein, during                
          communication between said base station and one said mobile                 
          terminals, said base station sends said mobile terminal a control           
          message at said second data rate, said control message specifying           
          said first data rate for subsequent messages to said mobile                 
          terminal.                                                                   
                                        References                                    
               Sigler et al. (Sigler)        5,717,830      Feb. 10, 1998             
          (Filing date May   29, 1996)                                                
               Serizawa et al. (Serizawa)    5,754,961      May 19, 1998              
                                             (Filing date June 20, 1995)              
               Mahany et al. (Mahany)        5,483,676      Jan.  9, 1996             
                                   Rejection at Issue                                 
               Claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as           
          being unpatentable over Serizawa in view of Mahany.                         
               Claims 3, 4 and 7 through 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Serizawa, Mahany and Sigler.               

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007