The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte TIMOTHY J. FULLER et al. _______________ Appeal No. 2002-1097 Application No. 09/382,613 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before PAK, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, 6, 7 and 9 through 14. Claims 3-5 and 15 are the only other claims pending in this application and stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention (Brief, page 2; final Office action dated June 18, 2001, Paper No. 8, page 3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007