Ex Parte FULLER et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1097                                                        
          Application 09/382,613                                                      



                    According to appellants, the invention is directed to             
          a purification process where a contaminated composition which               
          includes a polycarbonate polymer and a specified impurity is                
          contacted with an alumina adsorbent, with a portion of the                  
          impurity binding to the adsorbent (Brief, page 2).  Illustrative            
          independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                    
                    1.  A purification process comprising: contacting a               
          contaminated composition comprised of an optional fluid, a                  
          polymer, and an impurity with an adsorbent composition including            
          an adsorbent, wherein the adsorbent is selected from the group              
          consisting of an alumina and a magnesium sulfate, wherein a                 
          portion of the impurity binds to the adsorbent, wherein the                 
          polymer is a polycarbonate, a carbazole, a polyarylate, or a                
          copolyester having the formula                                              
          O                                                                           
          5                                                                           
          HOC ———(diacid ——— diol)n ——— OH                                            
          where n is the degree of polymerization wherein the impurity is             
          at least one of a salt, a polar material, and a surfactant.                 

                    The examiner has relied upon the following references             
          as evidence of obviousness:                                                 
          Tanaka et al. (Tanaka)          5,294,356          Mar. 15, 1994            
          McDaniel et al. (McDaniel)      6,077,978          Jun. 20, 2000            
          (filed Sep. 17, 1997)                                                       

                    The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as unpatentable over Tanaka in view of McDaniel (Answer,           

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007