Ex Parte TAKIZAWA et al - Page 7




                  Appeal No. 2002-1140                                                                                                                    
                  Application No. 08/947,470                                                                                                              

                  be equivalents (Answer at 10), the rejection has no teaching from the prior art to show                                                 
                  that the artisan considered the structures to be equivalents.                                                                           
                           We therefore cannot sustain the rejection of claims 5 and 15-20 under 35 U.S.C.                                                
                  § 103 as being unpatentable over the APA, Deeran, Furukawa, and Bonsall.                                                                


                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                              
                           The rejection of claims 5 and 15-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                         


                                                                    REVERSED                                                                              




                                             ERROL A. KRASS                                        )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             LANCE LEONARD BARRY                                   )     APPEALS                                          
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )       AND                                            
                                                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                                       
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP                                 )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      





                                                                           -7-                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007