Ex Parte OHSHITA - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                                  Paper No. 25         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                      ____________                                     
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                      ____________                                     
                                 Ex parte MIZUO OHSHITA                                
                                      ____________                                     
                                  Appeal No. 2002-1151                                 
                               Application No. 09/324,835                              
                                      ____________                                     
                                HEARD: FEBRUARY 19, 2003                               
                                      ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.          
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                  

               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                  
          through 20, 22, and 23. These claims constitute all of the claims            
          remaining in the application.                                                

               Appellant’s invention pertains to an apparatus for                      
          dispensing change and packing cash in a change pack. A basic                 
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of              
          exemplary claims 1 and 22, respective copies of which appear in              
          the APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 18).                                    




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007