The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 31 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SCOTT J. DEBOER, HUSAM AL-SHAREEF and RANDHIR THAKUR ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1167 Application No. 09/089,445 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before OWENS, TIMM, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 4-16, 18, 21-25, 27-29 and 36-39, and refusal to allow claims 17 and 30-35 as amended after final rejection. These are all of the claims remaining in the application. THE INVENTION The appellants claim a double sided lower electrode capacitor. Claim 4 is illustrative:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007