Ex Parte JACH et al - Page 6




                Appeal No. 2002-1191                                                                                                      
                Application No. 09/101,175                                                                                                


                covering layer.  After the gas inlet opening is covered, a porous cover is applied over the gas                           
                inlet opening so that the porous cover completely covers the gas inlet opening.  According to                             
                the specification, page 6, the protective layer (23) simultaneously serves as the protective                              
                covering (24) for the gas inlet opening (11) of the gas inlet duct (10).  The porous protective                           
                layer (23) is formed by sintering a paste (44).  To prevent the paste (44) from penetrating the                           
                gas inlet duct (10) a thin sheet layer (43) is applied over the gas inlet opening (11).  During                           
                the sintering process the thin sheet layer (43) burns away without leaving a residue or is                                
                transformed into a thin porous protective membrane layer.  (Specification, p. 7).  Thus, an                               
                electrochemical sensor that excludes a porous protective membrane layer would meet the                                    
                subject matter of claim 44.  This interpretation of the claim language is consistent with the                             
                requirement that the claims of the application are given the broadest reasonable                                          
                interpretation consistent with the specification as they would be construed by one of                                     
                ordinary skill in the art.  See In re Sneed, 710 F.2d 1544, 1548, 218 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed.                                 
                Cir. 1983).                                                                                                               
                        Appellants agree with the Examiner that the distinction between the electrochemical                               
                sensor of Makino and the claimed invention is the protective membrane layer over the                                      
                porous cover that covers the gas inlet opening.  (Reply Brief, p. 3).  As stated above, an                                
                electrochemical sensor that excludes a porous protective membrane layer would meet the                                    


                                                                    6                                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007