The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LEV M. BOLOTIN
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1219
Application No. 09/471,667
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1 through 10, all of the claims
remaining in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a micro device processing
system useable with a micro device using assembly system having a
control system and a robotic handling system. A basic
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of
exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in “Appendix A” of the
main brief (Paper No. 13).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007