Appeal No. 2002-1219
Application No. 09/471,667
appellant has disclosed and is claiming but only that the claims
on appeal "read on" something disclosed in the reference, i.e.,
all limitations of the claim are found in the reference. See
Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. , 713 F.2d 760, 772, 218 USPQ 781,
789 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1026 (1984).
Claim 1, the sole independent claim in the application, sets
forth a micro device processing system useable with a micro
device using assembly system having a control system and a
robotic handling system, comprising, inter alia, an input feeder,
a processing system, with the input feeder and the processing
system being capable of communication with the control system,
the input feeder being responsive to communication with the
control system to feed micro devices, the processing system being
capable of processing the micro devices and communicating to the
control system, and the robotic handling system being responsive
to communication of the processing system with the control system
to take micro devices and place them on the assembly system.
The examiner concludes that the claimed invention is
anticipated on the basis of an acknowledged prior art processing
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007