Ex Parte DEARN - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                 Paper No. 15                 
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                                         Ex parte ALAN ROY DEARN                                              
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 2002-1254                                              
                                          Application No. 09/411,381                                          
                                                __________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                    
                Before SCHEINER, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                  
                final rejection of claims 20-31, all of the claims remaining.  Claims 20, 21, 23, 26          
                and 28 are representative and read as follows:                                                
                      20.    Small particles of atovaquone wherein at least 90% of the particles              
                of atovaquone have a volume diameter in the range 0.1-3Tm.                                    
                      21.  Small particles of atovaquone wherein the particles of atovaquone                  
                have been microfluidized.                                                                     
                      23. A pharmaceutical composition comprising particles of atovaquone                     
                and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers therefor wherein at least                
                90% of the particles have a volume diameter in the range of 0.1-3Tm.                          







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007