The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DAVID E. LEVY, JOAN E. DURBIN, ADOLFO GARCIA-SASTRE and PETER PALESE __________ Appeal No. 2002-1299 Application No. 08/962,740 __________ ON BRIEF1 __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ADAMS and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5 and 35-37, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claims 1, 35 and 36 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are reproduced below: 1. An immortalized mammalian cell line homozygous for a Stat1 null allele 35. The immortalized mammalian cell line of Claim 1, wherein viral tropism of said cell line has been altered to be permissive for viral growth relative to that of the same cell line with wild type alleles of Stat1. 1 Appellants waived their request for Oral Hearing. Accordingly, we considered this appeal on Brief.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007