Appeal No. 2002-1299 Page 2 Application No. 08/962,740 36. The immortalized mammalian cell line of Claim 35, wherein the cells of said cell line are fibroblast cells capable of producing influenza virus at from about 103 to about 106 PFU/ml at about two days after having been infected. The references relied upon by the examiner are: Leder et al. (Leder) 5,087,571 Feb. 11, 1992 Jallat et al. (Jallat) 5,814,716 Sep. 29, 1998 Todaro et al. (Todaro), “Quantitative Studies of the Growth of Mouse Embryo Cells in Culture and Their Development Into Established Lines,” J. Cell. Bio., Vol. 17, pp. 299-313 (1963) Durbin et al. (Durbin), “Targeted Disruption of the Mouse Stat1 Gene Results in Compromised Innate Immunity to Viral Disease,” Cell, Vol. 94, pp. 443-50 (1996) GROUNDS OF REJECTION Claims 1-5 and 35-37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Durbin in view of Jallat, Leder and Todaro. CLAIM GROUPING Appellants set forth the following three claim groupings: (1) claims 1-5 and 37; (2) claim 35 and (3) claim 36. Accordingly claims 35 and 36 stand or fall alone. Since all the claims of group (1) stand or fall together, we limit our discussion to representative independent claim 1. Claims 2-5 and 37 will stand or fall together with claim 37. In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 590, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991). DISCUSSION According to the examiner (Answer, page 3), Durbin teach “the production of a Stat1 null allele vehicle capable of producing high titers of viruses.” In this regard, we note that the vehicles taught by Durbin are embryonic stem cells andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007