Ex Parte HICKS - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2002-1324                                                                                                
               Application No. 09/024,111                                                                                          


                       1.    A method of retrieving a program for execution on a computer                                          
                       system, the program stored in a file on the computer system and including                                   
                       a first set of program code, the method comprising:                                                         
                              (a) retrieving the file;                                                                             
                              (b) generating a second set of program code from the first set of                                    
                       program code; and                                                                                           
                              (c) associating the second set of program code with the file using a                                 
                       file attribute.                                                                                             
                       The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                             
                       Schwartz et al. [Schwartz]            5,047,918              Sep. 10, 1991                                  
                       Claims 1-69 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b) as anticipated by                                      
               Schwartz.                                                                                                           
                       Reference is made to the brief (supplemental brief-Paper No. 12-June 22, 2001)                              
               and answer (Paper No. 13) for the respective positions of appellant and the examiner.                               
                                                            OPINION                                                                
                       Under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b), anticipation is established only when a single prior art                         
               reference discloses, expressly or under the principles of inherency, each and every                                 
               element of a claimed invention as well as disclosing structure which is capable of                                  
               performing the recited functional limitations.  RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys.,                             
               Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984); cert. dismissed, 468                                 
               U.S. 1228 (1984); W.L. Gore and Assoc., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1554,                                 
               220 USPQ 303, 313 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984).                                              

                                                                2                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007