Appeal No. 2002-1324 Application No. 09/024,111 Accordingly, since, in our view, the examiner has not set forth a prima facie case of anticipation, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-69 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The examiner’s decision is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) eak/vsh 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007