The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte EINAR JOHAN AASEN, EDWARD JAMES MORLEY,
OLE TERJE MIDLING and ANDERS SANDVIK
__________
Appeal No. 2002-1352
Application 09/051,975
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before STONER Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and ABRAMS, and
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to
allow claims 9, 10, 13 and 16 as amended subsequent to the final
rejection in a paper filed October 19, 2001 (Paper No. 19) and
from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 18 through 20 and
23. Claims 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 21, 22 and 24 through 26, which
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007