Ex Parte AGNUS et al - Page 5


                   Appeal No. 2002-1353                                                                  Page 5                       
                   Application No. 09/268,353                                                                                         

                   21% to about 30% by weight of the dosage unit.”  See page 6.  Gram teaches                                         
                   that other excipients may be added as diluents, binders, disintegrants, lubricants,                                
                   buffers, and preservatives.  See page 8, line 29, to page 9, line 5.  Thus, Gram                                   
                   not only does not suggest lowering the amount of combined excipients to a                                          
                   maximum of 20%, it teaches away from doing so.                                                                     
                           It is true that Gram states that “[t]he kind and amount of excipients . . .                                
                   depends very much on the physicochemical properties of the active compound to                                      
                   be administered and on the desired absorption profile.”  This statement provides                                   
                   a general suggestion to vary the amount of excipients.  However, the reference                                     
                   must be considered as a whole.  “It is impermissible within the framework of                                       
                   section 103 to pick and choose from any one reference only so much of it as will                                   
                   support a given position, to the exclusion of other parts necessary to the full                                    
                   appreciation of what such reference fairly suggests to one of ordinary skill in the                                
                   art.”  In re Hedges, 783 F.2d 1038, 1041, 228 USPQ 685, 687 (Fed. Cir. 1986).                                      
                   The reference by Gram, when read in its entirety and without the benefit of                                        
                   hindsight, would not have suggested modifying its disclosure in the manner                                         
                   recited in the instant claims.                                                                                     
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007