Appeal No. 2002-1380 Application No. 08/786,270 Page 2 1. A system for identifying a local signal source supplying a program signal to a display of a monitored receiver, wherein the local signal source and the monitored receiver are located in a household, and wherein the system comprises: a program signature extracter arranged to extract a reference program signature representative of an output of the monitored receiver and to extract a source program signature representative of the program signal supplied by the local signal source, wherein the program signature extracter is located in the household; and, a signal source identifier arranged to identify either one of the local signal source and the monitored receiver as a local source of the program signal supplied to the display in response to the reference program signature and the source program signature. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Fisher et al. (Fisher) 5,294,977 March 15, 1994 Mischler 5,608,445 March 4, 1997 Thomas (PCT) WO 95/12278 May 4, 1995 Claims 1-13, 15-27, 49-53, 59-61, and 66-711 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Thomas. Claims 14, 28, 75, and 76 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Thomas. 1 The examiner omits claims 72 and 73 in the statement of the rejection, but specifically refers to claims 72 and 73 in the body of the rejection (final rejection, page 3). Accordingly, we consider claims 72 and 73 to be included in this rejection.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007