The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOO-SEUNG PARK
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1400
Application No. 09/131,279
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before RUGGIERO, DIXON and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-15,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.2
We REVERSE.
1 The panel decided that a reversal of the examiner’s rejection was necessary based upon
the showing in the brief due to a lack of a prima facie case by the examiner and notified
appellant’s representative that an Oral Hearing was not necessary.
2 The examiner has withdrawn the rejection under 35 USC § 112, first paragraph.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007