Ex Parte KADOMURA et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-1401                                                        
          Application No. 09/187/226                                                  
                         (A) charging aluminum nitride powder particles               
                    into a container provided in a molten metal pressure              
                    apparatus;                                                        
                         (B) applying pressure to the aluminum nitride                
                    powder particles in the container;                                
                         (C) pouring a molten aluminum base material into             
                    the container; and,                                               
                         (D) applying pressure to the molten aluminum base            
                    material in the container to fill the aluminum base               
                    material in a space between the aluminum nitride powder           
                    particles,                                                        
               wherein a pore ratio of said composite material is minimized           
          by providing said aluminum nitride particles with a first set of            
          particles having an average particle size of R, and a second set            
          of particles having an average particle size ranging from 3R to             
          5R, where a volume concentration of said first set of particles             
          is between 3 and 5 times a volume concentration of said second              
          set of particles.                                                           

                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Premkumar et al. (Premkumar)       5,775,403      Jul.  7, 1998             
          Young                              5,941,297      Aug. 24, 1999             
          (filed Sep. 23, 1996)                                                       
          Siemens AG (FR ‘878)1              2,028,878      Oct. 16, 1970             
               (French patent application)                                            
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 15-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second              
          paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point            
          out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellants            
          regard as the invention.  Claims 1-7, 9-22 and 24-26 stand                  
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows: claims 1, 2, 7, 9-11,            


               1 Citations herein to FR ‘878 are to an English translation            
          thereof, a copy of which is provided to the appellants with this            
          decision.                                                                   
                                       Page 2                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007