Ex Parte MAO et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                             
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                              
                                                                                            Paper No. 16                 
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                    ____________                                                         
                Ex parte SINING MAO, ANTHONY M. MACK, BRENDA A. EVERITT, EDWARD S.                                       
                                            MURDOCK, and ZHENG GAO                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 2002-1417                                                     
                                              Application No. 09/306,484                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                    ____________                                                         
              Before DIXON, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  




                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                        
              rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-11, and 20, which are all the claims remaining in the                          
              application.                                                                                               
                     We reverse.                                                                                         











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007