Appeal No. 2002-1454 Application 08/909,950 processing unit which runs a voice application; and data communications network input/output port connected to a data communications network accessing HTML documents; wherein at least one of said HTML documents has voice application HTML tags inserted therein, said tags providing the commands and data required to form said voice application. Reference The reference relied on by the Examiner is as follows: Wise et al. (Wise) 5,884,262 Mar. 16, 1999 (Filing date Mar. 28, 1996) Rejection at Issue Claims 1 through 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Wise. OPINION With full consideration being given to the subject matter on appeal, the Examiner’s rejection and arguments of Appellants and the Examiner, for the reasons stated infra, we reverse the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 102. It is axiomatic that anticipation of a claim under § 102 can be found only if the prior art reference discloses every element of the claim. See In re King, 801 F.2d 1324, 1326, 231 USPQ 136, 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007