Appeal No. 2002-1454
Application 08/909,950
presenting information contained in the documents which are not
constrained by an audio compatible format. Wise further teaches
that it is a feature of the invention to prevent access to
electronic information, which is not specifically formatted for
audio retrieval. See column 3, lines 19 through 26. Wise
teaches that Figure 2 shows the system architecture of the
preferred embodiment. See column 5, lines 38 through 39. When a
telephone 10 is connected to the system 200, the call manager 210
software implemented on this computer directs the audio file
player 270 to recite a voice prompt, such as “you have reached
the Audio Web Connection . . . .” See column 5, lines 46 through
53. This audio prompt allows the user to select a HTML document
from the World Wide Web. See column 5, lines 53 through 65.
When a document is accessed, it will be processed advantageously
through a parser 230. The parser 230 will interpret the content
of the document. Wise further discloses in columns 6 through
column 7, how the parser 230 converts the HTML document into a
voice message to be sent over the telephone. However, Wise does
not teach that the HTML documents has voice application HTML tags
inserted therein, said tags providing the commands and data
required to form said voice application as recited in Appellants’
claims.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007