Appeal No. 2002-1470 Page 8
Application No. 09/490,192
because the paging signals are received from data bus 64, we find
that Grossheim discloses transmitting security signals received
from the bus, to the paging controller.
From all of the above, we are not convinced of any error on
the part of the examiner, and find that the examiner has
established a prima facie case of anticipation of claim 1 that
has not been successfully rebutted by appellant. Accordingly,
we sustain the rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being clearly anticipated by Grossheim. As claims 2-9, 15-19,
21-25, 27-32, and 34-39 fall with claim 1 (brief, page 3) the
rejection of claims 2-9, 15-19, 21-25, 27-32, and 34-39 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007