Ex Parte HUNT et al - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2002-1555                                       Page 5           
          Application No. 09/511,572                                                  


          explained how the distribution system for supplying nebulized               
          process chemicals for treating substrates disclosed by Ni or the            
          gas supply vent pipe arrangement (110-114, Fig. 3) used for                 
          supplying gases for metal organic chemical vapor deposition                 
          (MOCVD) taught by Fujii would have led one of ordinary skill in             
          the art to modify the distinctly different dual substrate                   
          filament synthetic diamond deposition system of Anthony in a                
          manner so as to arrive at the claimed subject matter with a                 
          reasonable expectation of success in so doing.                              
               While the examiner asserts that Fujii refers to a superior             
          degree of uniformity in forming a compound layer in the MOCVD               
          system disclosed therein, the examiner has not reasonably                   
          established that the gas introduction system of Fujii would                 
          suggest a modification of the dual substrate and filament driven            
          synthetic diamond deposition system of Anthony that would result            
          in the claimed structure.  Ni is perhaps even more remote in that           
          nebulized chemical supply system disclosed therein promotes a               
          circular flow pattern in the process chamber (column 8, lines 53-           
          57) whereas Anthony, as noted above, is concerned with deposition           
          on parallel substrates with gas flow therebetween.                          
               It is well settled that the mere fact that prior art may be            
          modified to reflect features of the claimed invention does not              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007