The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 33 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FARAMARZ AZADEGAN ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1632 Application No. 08/941,7851 ____________ HEARD: MARCH 5, 2003 ____________ Before FLEMING, LEVY and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3-8, 10-37, 39-46, 48-55, 57-62, 64-69, 71, 72 and 74. Claims 2, 9, 38, 47, 56, 63, 70 and 73 have been canceled. We reverse. 1 Application for patent filed September 30, 1997, which claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 from provisional Application No. 60/033,426, filed January 24, 1996.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007