Ex Parte POLZIN - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                               Paper No. 15           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                               Ex parte NORBERT POLZIN                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2002-1641                                  
                             Application No. 09/276,213                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 1 through 10.  Claims 11 through 13, the only           
          other claims pending in this application, have been allowed.                


          Appellant's invention is directed to a method and device for                
          controlling vibration at at least one wheel during a braking                
          intervention independent of the driver, i.e., during an anti-lock           
          control or a traction control situation, wherein the wheel                  







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007