The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES PETER WARD
and KERRY MALETSKY
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1695
Application No. 08/971,386
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRY, LEVY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 2, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.
BACKGROUND
Appellants' invention relates to a method and apparatus for
deploying and tracking computers. An understanding of the
invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,
which is reproduced as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007