Appeal No. 2002-1784 Application No. 09/583,333 Page 5 explicitly or inherently. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Appellant asserts (brief, page 7) that although Dery uses the term "bus", the patent fails to teach or suggest a data communications bus as in the claimed invention. It is argued (id.) that Dery discloses a conventional wiring arrangement to actuate the controlled devices shown in figure 2, and that in Dery, the remote starter interfaces with the controlled devices through conventional vehicle wiring and not through a data communications bus as claimed. The examiner's position (final rejection, page 2) is that bus 24 of Dery is a data communications bus because (final rejection, page 8) it interfaces between the microprocessor unit and various vehicle components to carry out various controls. The examiner concludes (id.) that the bus is inherently a data communications bus for communicating with various components of the vehicle. We find that the issue before us with respect to the claims rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is whether bus 24 of Dery is a data communications bus. As stated by the court in In re Hiniker Co., 150 F.3d 1362, 1369, 47 USPQ2d 1523, 1529 (Fed. Cir. 1998) “[t]he name of the game is the claim.” Claims will be givenPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007