The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AMANULLAH KHAN and WARREN COON
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1810
Application No. 09/336,503
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, HAIRSTON, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-22.
Claim 23 had been withdrawn as being directed to a non-elected invention.
Subsequently, in the Reply Brief, the appellants withdrew the appeal of claims 1, 3, 4,
6, 7, 8 and 9, leaving before us on appeal claims 2, 5 and 10-22.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007