The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JUNG-WAN KO, DONG-HO SHIN, IN-SIK PARK, YOUNG-SUN SEO, HAN-KOOK CHOI, JONG-PHIL PARK, HEE-DEUK PARK, and KYU-HYOONG LEE, ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1860 Application No. 09/204,275 ____________ HEARD: AUGUST 19, 2003 ____________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-8, 33-40, and 42-53, which are all of the claims pending in the present application. Claims 9-32 and 41 have been canceled. At page 3 of the Answer, the Examiner indicates the allowability of claims 44-47. Accordingly, only the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-8, 33-40, 42, 43, and 48-53 is before us on appeal. AmendmentsPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007