Ex Parte KO et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 38         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                   Ex parte JUNG-WAN KO, DONG-HO SHIN, IN-SIK PARK,                   
                     YOUNG-SUN SEO, HAN-KOOK CHOI, JONG-PHIL PARK,                    
                          HEE-DEUK PARK, and KYU-HYOONG LEE,                          
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2002-1860                                 
                              Application No. 09/204,275                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                HEARD: AUGUST 19, 2003                                
                                     ____________                                     
          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of           
          claims 1-8, 33-40, and 42-53, which are all of the claims pending           
          in the present application.  Claims 9-32 and 41 have been canceled.         
          At page 3 of the Answer, the Examiner indicates the allowability of         
          claims 44-47.  Accordingly, only the Examiner’s rejection of claims         
          1-8, 33-40, 42, 43, and 48-53 is before us on appeal.  Amendments           








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007