Ex Parte Curtis - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-1911                                                                  Page 2                
              Application No. 09/598,087                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellant's invention relates to an apparatus for measuring the weight of a                      
              seat occupant (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the                 
              appendix to the appellant's brief.                                                                          


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Kiuchi                              4,181,012                           Jan. 1, 1980                        
              Asche                               5,481,078                           Jan. 2, 1996                        
              Verma et al. (Verma)                5,942,695                           Aug. 24, 1999                       
              Mehney et al. (Mehney)              6,039,344                           Mar. 21, 2000                       


                     Claims 1, 3 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated                      
              by Verma.                                                                                                   


                     Claims 1 to 3, 7 to 15 and 17 to 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                          
              being unpatentable over Mehney in view of Kiuchi.                                                           


                     Claims 4 to 6 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                   
              unpatentable over Mehney in view of Kiuchi and Asche.                                                       










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007