The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK CLEMENTS, JOE FADER,
CHRIS KEENEY, STEVE YOLLICK, and JIM HAWKINS
____________
Appeal No. 2002-2017
Application No. 09/567,457
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 6. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining
in the application.
Appellants' invention pertains to a suspension system for a
vehicle and to a method of increasing articulation of a vehicle
suspension system having a stabilizer bar and an end link. A
basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007