Appeal No. 2002-2017 Application No. 09/567,457 reading of exemplary claims 1 and 6, respective copies of which appear in the APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 13). As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the document specified below: Kincaid et al. 5,954,353 Sep. 21, 1999 (Kincaid) The following rejection is before us for review. Claims 1 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kincaid. The full text of the examiner's rejection and response to the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer (Paper No. 15), while the complete statement of appellants' argument can be found in the main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 13 and 16). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007