Appeal No. 2002-2073
Application No. 09/210,104 Page 15
the program and detecting and correcting the malfunction only in
response to a determination that a malfunction has occurred, the
rejection of independent claims 9 and 17, as well as claims 10,
11, 14-18, and 22-24, dependent therefrom, is reversed.
We turn next to the rejection of claims 4, 5, 12, 13, 20,
and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Borchardt in
view of Mann, and further in view of Alexander. We reverse the
rejection of claim 4, 5, 12, 13, 20, and 21 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) because Alexander does not make up for the basic
deficiencies of Borchardt and Mann.
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007