The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOMOYA YAMAKAWA, MASAHIRO KAWAI, YUTAKA OHASHI, YUICHI SAKAI, AKIRA YAMASHITA, and KAZUHIKO TSUTSUMI ____________ Appeal No. 2002-2082 Application No. 09/289,393 ____________ HEARD: AUGUST 21, 2003 ____________ Before RUGGIERO, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 5-7, 9 and 10, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to a thermo-sensitive flow rate sensor. An understanding of the invention can be derivedPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007