Ex Parte JARDIN - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2002-2126                                                       
         Application 08/931,187                                                     

                                    BACKGROUND                                      
              The invention relates to a method and apparatus for secure            
         communications between a server and a remote client, in which the          
         server selects a security algorithm from a plurality of security           
         algorithms and communicates the selected security algorithm to             
         the client which uses the algorithm to communicate with the                
         server.  This avoids the problem in the prior art of using a               
         single algorithm that must be installed on the computers.                  
              Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                          
                   1.  A system for secure communications over a                    
              communication medium comprising:                                      
                   a client; and                                                    
                   a server accessible via the medium by the client, the            
              server being configured to communicate via the medium with            
              the client that is configured to run an application program           
              including a plurality of security algorithms accessible to            
              the server, wherein the server is configured to select, upon          
              a request from the client, a security algorithm from said             
              plurality of security algorithms, and to communicate the              
              selected security algorithm to the client.                            

              The examiner relies on the following reference:                       
              Borza               6,076,167         June 13, 2000                   
         (filed August 11, 1997)                                                    
              Claims 1-34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being          
         anticipated by Borza.                                                      
              We refer to the final rejection (Paper No. 19) and the                
         examiner's answer (Paper No. 27) (pages referred to as "EA__")             
         for a statement of the examiner's rejection, and to the                    

                                       - 2 -                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007