Ex Parte FOX - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-2146                                                        
          Application No. 09/428,261                                                  

                    gums, and mixtures thereof to keep at least 75% of the            
                    supplement’s soluble calcium ion in solution for at               
                    least about 2 days after said supplement is placed in             
                    solution; and                                                     
                    (c) an edible acid component comprising a mixture of              
                    citric acid and malic acid;                                       
          wherein the percentage of citric acid to total acid is at least             
          23% and not more than 75%; the weight ratio of acid equivalents             
          to base equivalents is from 0.5 to 1.8; and at least 75% of the             
          supplement’s soluble calcium ion remains in solution for at least           
          about 2 days after said supplemant is placed in solution.                   
               The examiner relies upon Mehansho et al. (Mehansho), U.S.              
          Patent No. 4,992,282, issued Feb. 12, 1991, as evidence of                  
          obviousness.  Accordingly, the claims on appeal stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Mehansho (Answer,             
          page 3).1  We affirm the examiner’s rejection essentially for the           
          reasons stated in the Answer, the reasons set forth in the                  
          decision in related Appeal No. 1995-1058 (Paper No. 23 in                   
          Application No. 07/906,638), and those reasons discussed below.             
          OPINION                                                                     
               A.  Background                                                         
               This application is a continuation of Application No.                  
          07/906,638, now abandoned, where a merits panel of this Board               


               1The references to Gailley and Boncy et al., as applied in             
          the final Office action dated Aug. 28, 2001, Paper No. 13, have             
          not been repeated in the Answer (see pages 2-3).  Accordingly, we           
          consider that the examiner has withdrawn these references.                  
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007