Ex Parte Doan - Page 5




             Appeal No. 2002-2159                                                             Page 5               
             Application No. 09/652,969                                                                            


                    Iwata discloses a removal system for a workpiece having an overlying material                  
             comprising a suction nozzle (4) having a suction port (6) for removing coating material               
             from the edge parts of the workpiece along with a diluent chemical that has been                      
             sprayed onto the coating to facilitate its removal (columns 1 and 2).  Positioned within              
             the suction nozzle is a cleaning liquid nozzle (jetted outlet 5) through which a diluent              
             chemical may be injected.  Nozzle 5 is “offset from the longitudinal axis of the nozzle [4]           
             and forms an angle of 30° to 85° with respect to the longitudinal axis of the nozzle”                 
             (column 1, line 66 et seq.).  Thus, it is our view that nozzle 5 is “configured to dispense           
             a chemical toward said workpiece,” as required by claim 38, even though the reference                 
             attaches importance to the fact that the orientation of the nozzle creates an eddy                    
             stream in the vacuum nozzle so as to clean it during operation.  We therefore find the                
             appellant’s first argument not to be persuasive.2                                                     
                    However, we agree with the appellant that there is no evidence in the two                      
             references to support the examiner’s position that one of ordinary skill in the art would             
             have been motivated to provide the Iwata system with means for moving the suction                     
             nozzle and the applicator nozzle commensurately in order to provide ease of loading                   


                    2We note in passing that since no other means for placing cleaning fluid on the workpiece is   
             disclosed, it would appear that the cleaning fluid dispensed from nozzle 5 also impinges upon the     
             workpiece.  We base this opinion upon the explanation in column 1 that the invention is an improvement
             upon prior art nozzles in which a single nozzle element both applies cleaning fluid and removes cleaning
             fluid along with the material constituting the lateral edge bead (column 1, line 24 et seq.), and that
             evacuating ports 10 and 10' of the inventive system “are used to remove the lateral edge bead portions
             after dilution, together with the cleaning fluid from the coated layer” (column 2, lines 34-38).      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007