Appeal No. 2002-2208 Page 11
Application No. 09/543,989
To summarize, the examiner’s rejections of claims 25-27 as being anticipated by
Pollock and by Yoder are sustained and the rejections of claims 25-27 as being
anticipated by van den Broek and claims 25-34 as being anticipated by Groh are
reversed. The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007