Ex Parte MORIMATSU et al - Page 2


          Appeal No. 2002-2215                                                        
          Application No. 08/952,475                                                  

          representative claim 11 reproduced below:                                   
                    11.  A meat product containing as lipids                          
               approximately the same content of vegetable oil and                    
               animal fat, said meat product comprising:                              
                    (a) a fat content of less than half of that                       
               present in conventional meat products, and                             
                    (b) 8 to 10g of soy protein isolate per 100g of                   
               meat product,                                                          
                    wherein the meat product possesses a plasma-                      
               cholesterol-suppressing property.                                      
               The examiner relies on the following prior art references as           
          evidence of unpatentability:                                                
          Helmer et al.            3,309,204           Mar. 14, 1967                  
               (Helmer)                                                               
          Bonkowski                5,164,213           Nov. 17, 1992                  
          James Giese, “Developing Low-Fat Meat Products,” Food Technology,           
          Apr. 1992, at 100-08.                                                       
               Claims 3, 4, 7, 10 through 13, 16, and 17 on appeal stand              
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Giese.               
          (Examiner’s answer mailed Apr. 30, 2002, paper 21, pages 3-4.)              
          Separately, claims 3, 4, 7, 10 through 13, 16, and 17 on appeal             
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the            
          combined teachings of Bonkowski and Helmer.  (Id. at page 4.)               
               We affirm these rejections.1                                           
                            The Rejection Based on Giese                              

               1  The appellants submit that the appealed claims stand or             
          fall together.  (Appeal brief filed Jan. 11, 2002, paper 20, p.             
          3.)  We therefore confine our discussion to claim 11, the sole              
          independent claim on appeal.  37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(1997).                   

          2                                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007