Ex Parte LYLE et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           

                                                       Paper No. 24                   
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                             Ex parte ROBERT WILLIAM LYLE,                            
                                 JAMES ZU-CHIA TENG and                               
                                     JAY A. YOTHERS                                   
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 2002-2218                               
                              Application 09/322,698                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF1                                               
                                    _______________                                   
          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's              
          final rejection of claims 1-36.  Representative claim 1 is                  
          reproduced below:                                                           

               1  This appeal was scheduled for oral hearing on May 22,               
          2003.  Because the panel assigned to this appeal determined that            
          all the rejections of the claims on appeal are reversed,                    
          appellants were informed of this determination by telephone by              
          Administrator Craig Feinberg on Tuesday May 20, 2003.  This                 
          action obviated appellants' attendance at the hearing and this              
          decision confirms this telephone call.                                      
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007