Ex Parte Sproatt et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was  not written          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                       Paper No. 23            
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                  Ex parte JAMES SPROATT, ALICE POSLEY                                         
                                               and MICHAEL SEIY                                                
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 2002-2227                                              
                                           Application No. 09/522,545                                          
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                             HEARD: March 11, 2003                                             
                                                 ____________                                                  
             Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
             ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claim 24.               
             Claims 1-5, 8-11, 20, 21, 25 and 26 have been allowed, and claims 6, 7, 12-19, 22 and             
             23 have been canceled.                                                                            


                   We REVERSE.                                                                                 










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007