Appeal No. 2002-2246 Application No. 09/192,110 CONCLUSION For the above reasons we conclude that the Examiner has not carried the burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of the invention recited in any of the Appellants’ claims. Consequently, we reverse the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejections. REVERSED ) ) CHARLES F. WARREN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) JEFFREY T. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JTS/kis 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007