Ex Parte Cody et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-2250                                                        
          Application No. 09/519,823                                                  

               1.  An embedded high-tension, high-compression foundation              
          for an above ground tower comprising:                                       
               a ground level cap for supporting the tower;                           
               attachments to secure the tower to the cap; and                        
               embedded tension/compression components secured to the cap             
          and terminating only distally with a bearing surface resistant to           
          pullout and overturning forces to provide embedded tension                  
          retention of the components within a terminal soil/rock mass;               
               wherein the components extend to deep, high-strength soil              
          layers in absence of deep wide-area excavation to provide                   
          exceptional bearing and tension capacity, high resistance to                
          overturning moment forces acting on the tower, and compression              
          significantly higher than the tension capacity.                             
               8.  A method of constructing an embedded high-tension, high-           
          compression foundation for an above ground tower comprising:                
               establishing a minimal ground-level excavation for a cap;              
               embedding below ground level tension/compression components            
          that terminate only distally in a bearing surface to provide                
          below ground tension retention within a terminal soil/rock mass             
          absent deep wide area excavation, so that the components extend             
          to deep, high-strength soil layers to provide exceptional bearing           
          and tension capacity, high resistance to pullout and overturning            
          forces, and compression significantly higher than the tension               
          capacity;                                                                   
               forming the cap; and                                                   
               securing the cap to the components.                                    

                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Thornley                      2,741,910           Apr. 17, 1956             

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007