Appeal No. 2002-2250 Application No. 09/519,823 Lejeck et al. (Lejeck) 3,006,626 Oct. 31, 1961 THE REJECTION Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lejeck in view of Thornley. Attention is directed to the appellants’ main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 13 and 15) and the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 14) for the respective positions of the appellants and examiner regarding the merits of this rejection. DISCUSSION Lejeck, the examiner’s primary reference, discloses a concrete foundation mat 24 for a blast furnace stove 10. The stove includes an outer shell 17 having anchor rods 29 welded to its bottom section 25. When poured, the concrete mat embeds the bottom section of the shell and the rods to anchor the stove against upward pressures exerted by cold blasts of air entering the stove for heating prior to being conveyed to a downstream blast furnace. Figure 1 depicts the stove mounted on the concrete mat and also shows a series of unidentified elements extending downwardly from the bottom of the mat. In applying Lejeck against the appealed claims, the examiner finds (see page 3 in the answer) that the unidentified elements (labeled by the examiner as “P”) extending downwardly from the 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007