The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 32 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MARK P. MIELKE, STEVEN D. TUCKER, and ARTHUR R. HENNESSEY __________ Appeal No. 2002-2295 Application 08/988,457 ___________ HEARD: April 3, 2003 ___________ Before BARRETT, FLEMING, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5, 7, 8, 11 through 14, 16, 17 and 20. Claims 4, 6, 9, 10, 15, 18 and 19 stand objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form. Claims 21 through 32 have been canceled. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007